By: Harshit Joshi

INTRODUCTION

An appeal was brought before the Supreme Court in which both the Delhi High Court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court refused to have territorial jurisdiction over the dispute due to a difference of opinion and dismissed the appeals filed before them. The Supreme Court solved the conundrum concerning the appellate jurisdiction of the High Courts under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after ‘Acts’) in its judgment dated 18 August 2022 in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. M/s. ABC Papers Limited. Another question that the

• Police have been reportedly in a position to hyperlink the Idaho killings suspect to the crime scene with DNA.

• They ran DNA via family tree databases and obtained a success, nameless legislation enforcement sources informed ABC Information.

• CNN reported that police then tracked the suspect again to Pennsylvania, the place he was arrested.

Police have been reportedly in a position to hyperlink the suspect in

About RMLNLU

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Nationwide Regulation College is an institute for legislation in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Dr. RMLNLU was established within the 12 months 2005, and since then, has been offering undergraduate and postgraduate authorized training.

Concerning the Journal Committee

The Committee was constituted with the target of selling authorized analysis and writing. Other than conducting the RMLNLU Worldwide Authorized Essay Writing Competitors yearly, the Committee yearly publishes two peer reviewed journals – the RMLNLU Regulation Evaluation and the RMLNLU Journal on CMET (Communication, Media, Leisure and Know-how) Regulation. Each these journals publish articles, essays, case notes/feedback

ABOUT THE ORGANIZER

The Legal Lock is a boutique forum with the vision of making it an all-in-one platform providing various legal assistance to students and practitioners. Its mission is to spread legal awareness across the masses by conducting various events, webinars, seminars, etc. As of now, it provides a trusted blog page, a highly indexed Journal, law notes, event updates, and authentic promotions.

About the Competition

Keeping the spirits high and boosted we have come up with the 1st National Mediation Competition, 2023. The competition aims to promote and foster the culture of mediation as a form of alternative

Three weekends removed from his arrest for drunk driving in Pittsburgh, former West Virginia coach Bob Huggins is claiming — through one of his attorneys — he never resigned as the Mountaineers men’s basketball coach. He’s also requesting a return to power at the helm of the program.

The news broke Saturday via MetroNews, which released the July 7 letter from David A. Campbell (Huggins’ attorney) to West Virginia president E. Gordon Gee. MetroNews also published the July 8 rebuttal from WVU to Huggins’ lawyer, who apparently is working independently from other counsel that has been in communication with school

Lawyers representing billionaire Elon Musk and Tesla asked a United States district court judge to toss out a motion to have them sanctioned over alleged conflicts of interest in a $258 billion lawsuit alleging Musk participated in an illegal racketeering scheme related to the Dogecoin (DOGE) cryptocurrency.

In a filing dated July 6, Musk and Tesla’s team responded to the June 25 motion filed by Evan Spencer, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the case against Musk.

Spencer referred to the defendants’ lawyers as “yes men” in his filing and asked the judge to declare it a conflict of interest

Ripple v. SEC: Lawyer Allegedly Leaves Case, XRP Holders’ Representative Outlines What It Means

U.Today – In a recent update to the SEC v. case, attorney and legal representative of holders, , took to Twitter to express his initial excitement followed by a disappointing revelation. Deaton received an email filing regarding the case, which initially caused butterflies in his stomach. However, his hopes were quickly dashed as he discovered that the email simply announced one lawyer’s withdrawal from the case.

Deaton promptly clarified the implications of this withdrawal, stating that it holds no substantial significance for the ongoing legal battle

The two lawyers who submitted fake legal research generated by AI chatbot ChatGPT just got hit with a $5,000 fine and a scolding by a federal judge. The lawyers submitted a legal brief on an airline injury case in May that turned out to be riddled with citations from nonexistent cases. The attorneys, Steven A. Schwartz and Peter LoDuca of Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, initially defended their research even after opposing counsel pointed out that it was fake, but eventually apologized to the court.

Schwartz, who created the ChatGPT-generated brief, already had a court hearing on June 8 in which