Swadesh Kumar Agarwal v. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal – The Legal Lock

FACTS
The facts giving rise to the disputes stemmed from the division of family properties, which were sent to a Sole Arbitrator. The Sole Arbitrator was absent on one of the specified occasions, making it impossible for him to conduct the proceedings.
This prompted Dinesh Kumar Agarwal (“Respondent”) to rescind the Ld. Sole Arbitrator’s appointment. In order to terminate the Ld. Sole Arbitrator’s mandate due to the delay in ending the proceedings, the Respondent filed applications under Section 14(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) before the relevant Ld. District Court.
In order to have the Respondent’s



