NEW DELHI, March 31 (Reuters) – A group of 125 law firms has called for a reform that will allow the entry of foreign firms into India to be put on hold, calling the proposal “discriminatory” and saying it creates an unlevel playing field between local and overseas companies. In a 20-page letter to the […]
NEW YORK, March 25, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Edgio, Inc. (NYSE: EGIO) resulting from allegations that Edgio may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased Edgio securities […]
The FTC announced yesterday that it was extending the deadline to submit public comments on its proposed rule banning non-competitive employment. With the extension, the FTC will now accept comments on the proposed rule until April 19. Originally, the deadline for submitting comments was March 20. Information on how to submit comments can be found […]
NEW YORK, March 5, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of ESS Tech Inc. (NYSE:GWH) between August 11, 2022 and December 7, 2022both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important March 13, 2023 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased ESS […]
New York, New York–(Newsfile Corp. – February 27, 2023) – The Klein Law Firm announced that a class action complaint has been filed on behalf of shareholders of Enovix Corporation ENVX alleging that the Company violated federal securities laws. This lawsuit is on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Enovix common stock […]
Published: Feb. 25, 2023 at 2:02 PM CST|Updated: 3 hours ago NEW YORK, Feb. 25, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — Rosen Law Firm, PA Logo(PRNewswire) WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: FATE) between April 2, 2020 and January 5, 2023, both dates inclusive […]
The District of Maryland recently awarded a software developer a mere $1.00 in nominal damages for contract and trade secret claims against a former employee, citing the immateriality of the defendant’s breach and plaintiff’s failure to prove a fair licensing price for its misappropriation damages. in AirFacts, Inc. v. de AmezagaAirFacts, a developer of accounting […]