NEW YORK, June 29, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Legislation Agency, a world investor rights legislation agency, reminds purchasers of the securities of Apyx Medical Company (NASDAQ: APYX) between Might 12, 2021 and March 11, 2022, each dates inclusive (the “Class Interval”), of the necessary August 5, 2022 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: When you bought Apyx securities throughout the Class Interval you might be entitled to compensation with out cost of any out of pocket charges or prices via a contingency price association.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To affix the Apyx class motion, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=6835 or

NEW YORK, June 29, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Regulation Agency, a worldwide investor rights legislation agency, reminds purchasers of the securities of LMP Automotive Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LMPX) between June 29, 2021 and Could 19, 2022, each dates inclusive (the “Class Interval”) of the necessary July 26, 2022 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you happen to bought LMP securities throughout the Class Interval, you might be entitled to compensation with out fee of any out of pocket charges or prices by a contingency payment association.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To affix the LMP class motion, go

A Central District of California court docket not too long ago denied a defendant’s movement for abstract judgment the place the defendant argued that the plaintiff’s claims for commerce secret misappropriation had been barred by the relevant statute of limitations. The court docket decided that the statute of limitations didn’t bar the plaintiff’s declare as a result of an inexpensive jury may discover that the plaintiff didn’t have cause to consider that all the parts of its commerce secret misappropriation declare had been met previous to the bar date. Particularly, the court docket concluded {that a} cheap jury may discover

The DC Circuit recently held that a “Mutual Non-Disparagement” clause requiring an employer to “direct” its employees not to disparage a former employee could reasonably be interpreted as prohibiting the employer itself from making disparaging statements.

in Wright v. Eugene & Agnes E. Meyer Foundation, Dr. Terri Wright, a former employee of the Eugene and Agnes E. Meyer Foundation (the “Foundation”), filed suit against the Foundation after discovering its CEO, Nicola Goren, had made disparaging statements about her.

The Foundation hired Wright in early February 2018 as its Vice President of Programs and Community. During Wright’s tenure, Goren criticized

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 19, 2023 / The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against UP Fintech Holding Limited (“UP Fintech” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ:TIGR) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s securities between April 29, 2020 and May 16, 2023, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before August 21, 2023.

If you are

NEW YORK, July 12, 2023 /PRNewswire/ —

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announced the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTAI) between December 15, 2021 and June 28, 2023, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move to Court no later than September 5, 2023.

SO WHAT: If you purchased BioXcel Therapeutics securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without

Shares of Mullen Automotive Inc. bounced Wednesday, after the electric-vehicle maker said he retained a law firm to help him combat illegal naked short-selling activities.

The stock MULN,
+5.75%
bounced 2.9% in morning trading, after falling 6.3% on Monday to close at a record low of 10.1 cents. It suffered a record 85.2% monthly plunge in June, even after the company reported last week that it recorded revenue for the first time and that it was in the “best financial position” in its history.

Establishing jurisdiction over a defendant is critical in every lawsuit. Trade secret cases are certainly no different. A recent appellate decision from Texas underscored this important point by dismissing a plaintiff’s claim against a defendant – who did not even deny that he received misappropriated trade secrets – for lack of jurisdiction.

The case is joe Formicola v. Virtual Integrated Analytics Solutions, LLC14^th Court of Appeals, Texas, Case No. 14-22-00412-CV (the state court case is Virtual Integrated Analytics Solutions LLC vs. Optimal Designs Incorporated et al., Case No. 202215877, in the 189th District Court of Harris County,