(Bloomberg) — A Texas judge has tossed out a disciplinary case against attorney Sidney Powell, finding state bar regulators failed to present enough valid evidence to keep alive claims that she violated ethics rules by filing frivolous post-election lawsuits.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Powell, a staunch ally of former President Donald Trump following the 2020 presidential election, leads a series of unsuccessful legal efforts to contest President Joe Biden’s wins in battleground states. She also promoted false conspiracy theories of widespread election fraud, including that voting machine software had flipped votes for Trump to Biden and had its origins in

Having emails and texts revealed in court — and thus available to prying public eyes — is a nightmare for any company. Fox News is living through that horror now after Dominion Voting Systems on Thursday filed a motion for summary judgment against the network, laying out dozens of internal communications that were sent during the months following the 2020 presidential election.

The filing in Delaware court is part of the Dominion’s $1.6 billion defamation case that accuses Rupert Murdoch’s network of knowingly promoting former President Trump’s false claims of election fraud, which included a disproved theory that the company

• Trump is now willing to submit a DNA sample for his civil rape case in NY, new court papers say.

• The deadline for new evidence has passed, so it’s unclear if the sample will come into play at trial.

• Carroll’s attorney called the offer “yet another bad faith and legally frivolous delay tactic.”

Former President Donald Trump has agreed to undergo DNA testing as part of his defense in an upcoming civil rape trial in New York federal court, but lawyers for his accuser say the offer is coming too late and is just another

Section 53 of The Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 53 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, specifically deals with different types of punishments which can be given by the Criminal Courts if the person is held liable under the Code. There are five kinds of punishments stated under Section 53 of the Code:

• -Death
• -Imprisonment for life
• -Imprisonment
• -Rigorous Imprisonment
• -Simple Imprisonment
• -Forfeiture of property
• -Fine

Considering the above punishments, the courts are supposed to follow the procedures and provisions which are prescribed under other adjective and substantive laws.

As per the scheme of the Code, the maximum punishment is

Citations: 1992 AIR 1904, 1991 SCR(1) 274

Appellant: Smt. Sureshta Devi

Respondents: Om Prakash

Decided On: 7.02. 1991

Equivalent Citations:

1. 1992 AIR 1904

2. 1991 SCR (1) 274

Benches:

SHETTY, KJ (J)

AGRAWAL, SC (J)

Statutes Referred:

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Special Marriage Act, 1954

Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976

In a marriage, a man and woman make a lifelong commitment to one another, promising to love and cherish one another until death do them part. The pair learns the true meaning of love, trust, tolerance, support and harmony through their marriage as a union. It is a community