Pakistan’s sports governance remains governed by a 62-year-old law that grants the federal authorities sweeping powers over national sporting bodies. The Sports (Development and Control) Ordinance 1962 was created for an era before global sports became a commercial industry with strict autonomy rules set by international federations.

This law’s design now conflicts with requirements from bodies like the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and FIFA. Sections 3(1) and 5 permit the government to establish statutory boards that oversee elections and administration within sports organizations. These provisions have repeatedly caused disputes with the Pakistan Olympic Association (POA) and National Sports Federations (NSFs), affecting athletes directly.

The 2014 conflict and consequences

In 2014, the IOC decided the government had no authority to interfere in the POA’s affairs. This followed an attempt by the Pakistan Sports Board (PSB), the federal agency formed under the 1962 law, to control the association’s internal operations. Ten years later, the PSB introduced measures allowing it to form election commissions for NSFs, resolve internal disputes, and appoint ad-hoc committees—despite objections from the POA and federations.

A division emerged in the sports community. Some federations supported the government, while others backed the POA. Athletes faced the consequences: funding and permission to compete internationally often depended on which side prevailed. The disagreement disrupted preparations for the 2012 London Olympics, and the government eventually reversed its stance after the IOC threatened to suspend Pakistan’s membership.

Related: Life’s journey from birth to death

FIFA suspended the Pakistan Football Federation (PFF) three times—twice in 2017 and 2021 for third-party interference, and in 2025 for failing to adopt constitutional changes ensuring fair elections. Each suspension halted funding, disrupted leagues, and left players uncertain.

A series of failed reforms

The country’s first National Sports Policy (NSP) appeared in 2001 but was never fully enforced. A 2005 update aimed to strengthen the sports system, but the POA rejected it, citing violations of the IOC Charter. The Supreme Court of Pakistan later ruled that all NSFs must follow the 2005 policy or risk losing affiliation and funding. The PSB demanded compliance; the POA refused, arguing the policy contradicted Olympic regulations.

The 2005 policy also failed to address the 18th Amendment, which transferred sports responsibilities to provincial governments. This created a fragmented system: provinces manage local development and infrastructure, while the federal government retains oversight through the Ministry of Inter-Provincial Coordination (IPC) and the PSB. The IPC minister described the setup as flawed, noting that the federal government handles international participation while provinces control the resources needed to prepare athletes.

In 2021, the government proposed a new NSP that would have placed NSFs under direct federal control. The plan stalled. Five years later, a 2026 draft finally addresses autonomy. It suggests independent status for federations if they meet PSB governance standards, comply with international rules, and achieve performance targets. The draft also includes transparent elections, fixed tenure limits, and independent audits. However, even if implemented, it remains an executive policy that cannot override the 1962 law’s powers.

For athletes, the impact is severe. When federations are suspended, they lose access to training camps, competitions, and funding. Coaches and support staff face instability. The system’s unpredictability discourages private investment, leaving sports dependent on government budgets that are often delayed or politicized. The pattern continues: federations are suspended, athletes suffer, and the government negotiates reinstatement—usually by conceding autonomy temporarily.

Related: Pakistan’s New Court Faces Old Legal Challenges

The 2026 draft may not become law. Even if it does, it cannot resolve the core issue: no policy can replace the need for updated legislation. The 1962 law was written for a centralized state. Today, Pakistan’s sports governance involves overlapping jurisdictions, outdated powers, and conflicting international obligations. Without legal reform, the same disputes will recur, and athletes will continue to bear the cost.

Discussions about creating new provinces add complexity. If enacted, this could further divide sports resources, worsening the fragmentation caused by the 18th Amendment. Legal analysts agree the solution isn’t another policy adjustment. What’s needed is a new law that defines federal and provincial roles, ensures federation independence, and establishes a dispute resolution process that doesn’t harm athletes.

While the government has acknowledged the need for change, acknowledgment alone isn’t sufficient. Until the 1962 ordinance is replaced, Pakistan’s sports governance will remain outdated, and its athletes will keep facing challenges they didn’t create.

This instability also affects common injuries athletes sustain during training and competition, as inconsistent funding limits access to medical support and rehabilitation.