
A court in Valencia has ruled that a property registrar must register a sale deed signed by an unregistered administrator. The ruling, issued by the Civil Section of the Valencia Court of First Instance, overturns the registrar’s refusal to register the sale. The judgment, identified as sentence n.º 234/2026 dated 7 September 2026, not only overturned the registrar’s refusal but also ordered the registrar to bear the costs of the proceeding.
The case stems from a December 2024 sale deed notarized by the administrator of a company. The registrar denied registration, arguing that the administrator’s appointment wasn’t yet recorded in the Commercial Registry. Because the administrator’s appointment was still awaiting entry in the Mercantile Registry, the registrar argued a lack of formal proof, yet the deed itself bore the notary’s explicit ratification of the administrator’s authority.
Court: Notary’s Judgment Sufficient for Representation
The court disagreed, citing Article 98.2 of Law 24/2001. This law states that a notary’s judgment on the sufficiency of representation is, in itself, proof of valid representation. The registrar’s role, the court said, is limited to verifying the notary’s judgment and its consistency with the deed. Article 98.2 therefore obliges the notary to assume full responsibility for the factual accuracy of the sufficiency judgment, meaning any error would be subject to professional liability rather than to the registrar’s discretion.
The ruling highlights a practical procedural issue. The registrar claimed the decision was made by a temporary registrar who preceded him. The court dismissed this argument, holding the registrar accountable for any decision issued under his signature. By signing the qualification, the registrar created a definitive act of registration authority, and the law expressly prevents the citizen from having to investigate internal procedural histories of the registry office.
Implications for Property Transactions
This decision reinforces a key principle for legal certainty: a notary’s certification of representation cannot be overridden by a registrar due to a lack of registration in the Commercial Registry. It also clarifies the registrar’s responsibility for decisions issued under their signature. The court further stressed that the mere absence of an entry in the Commercial Registry does not nullify a notarial declaration, because the registration of the administrator’s title is a subsequent, not constitutive, step.
The ruling isn’t final and can be appealed to the Valencia Provincial Court. Víctor Soriano, the lawyer representing the company, stated that the decision strengthens legal security in property transactions. Should the registrar choose to contest the ruling, the appeal must be lodged before the Audiencia Provincial de Valencia, where the higher court will examine the merits of the registrar’s objections.
This case mirrors past disputes where registrars have challenged notary-certified representations. It shows the importance of notarial judgments in ensuring smooth property transactions, even when administrative formalities like registry updates are pending.
Registrar Accountability in Focus
The court‘s emphasis on registrar accountability aligns with a 2015 Supreme Court ruling that established registrars as the sole parties responsible for legal challenges to their decisions. This precedent ensures citizens aren’t burdened with internal registry procedures. The 2015 Supreme Court decision (ECLI:ES:TS:2015:252) is repeatedly cited for establishing that only the registrar himself may be sued or challenged directly, reinforcing the personal accountability framework.
The case demonstrates the courts’ role in balancing the powers of notaries and registrars, ultimately prioritizing legal certainty and the smooth functioning of property transactions. In this way, the Valencia judgment illustrates the judiciary’s commitment to preserving the equilibrium between notarial certainty and registrarial oversight, ensuring that procedural delays do not impede legitimate property transfers.