NEW YORK, Jan. 16, 2023 /PRNewswire/ —

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of NeoGenomics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NEO) between February 27, 2020 and April 26, 2022both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important February 6, 2023 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased NeoGenomics securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the NeoGenomics class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=4888 or call Philip Kim,

In the first installment of our 2023 Trade Secrets & Non-Competes Webinar Series, Seyfarth partners Kate Perrelli, Michael Wexler, Robert Milligan, Dan Hart, and Dawn Mertineit discussed the new Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) proposed rule banning the use of non-competes with employees and workers. The expert panel addressed what the proposed rule would do and what employers need to know to respond.

As a conclusion to this webinar, we compiled a summary of takeaways:

• The FTC’s attempted regulation of employment non-competes as part of its rulemaking powers is unprecedented in the 109 years since its creation in 1914. The FTC

NEW YORK, Jan. 15, 2023 /PRNewswire/ —

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers and acquirers of Compound DAO tokens (COMP), on or after December 8, 2021against defendants Compound DAO, Robert Leshner, Geoffrey HayesAH Capital Management, LLC, Polychain Alchemy, LLC, Bain Capital Ventures (GP), LLC, Gauntley Networks, Inc., and Paradigm Operations LP, of the important February 7, 2023 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased or acquired COMP on or after December 8, 2021 you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs

NEW YORK, Jan. 9, 2023 /PRNewswire/ —

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Torrid Holdings (NYSE: CURV) pursuant and/or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering conducted in July 2021 (the “IPO”), of the important January 17, 2023 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Torrid securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Torrid class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=9874 or call Philip Kim, Esq. toll-free

Restrictive covenants and non-compete agreements have been a frequent topic of this blog in recent months, and rightly so. Non-competitors are generally thought to be effective tools to help firms protect trade secrets and competitive advantages. However, these agreements are falling out of favor across the country – the DOJ recently files a Statement of Interest in a state court case taking the position that non-competites may violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. Further, states continue to pass laws limiting or banning the use of noncompete agreements, including Illinois, Oregon, Nevada, DCand Colorado.

But one Texas

Printed: Jan. 4, 2023 at 4:45 AM CST|Up to date: 17 hours in the past

NEW YORK, Jan. 4, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — The Gross Legislation Agency points the next discover to shareholders of Unisys Company.

Shareholders who bought shares of UIS in the course of the class listed interval are inspired to contact the agency concerning doable lead plaintiff appointments. Appointment as lead plaintiff isn’t required to partake in any restoration.

CONTACT US HERE:

PERIOD CLASS: August 3, 2022 to November 7, 2022

ALLEGATIONS: The grievance alleges that in the course of the class interval,

A decide within the Northern District of Texas just lately declined to dismiss a lawsuit, CiCi Enterprises LP et al. v. Mucho Pizza, LLC et al., alleging a pizza franchisee failed to keep up the confidentiality of Texas pizza chain CiCi Enterprises LP’s commerce secrets and techniques after two associates inked a growth take care of competitor, Papa John’s. This case highlights the significance of complete agreements and the discount of settlement modifications to writing.

Starting in 2010, CiCi Enterprises^[1] and Mucho Pizza, LLC^[2] entered into 17 franchise agreements, which supplied Mucho Pizza entry to CiCi Enterprises’